What were the majority opinions of the Supreme Court in South Dakota v Dole?

What were the majority opinions of the Supreme Court in South Dakota v Dole?

In a 7-to-2 decision, the Court held that Congress did not exceed its spending powers, or violate the Twenty-First Amendment, by passing legislation conditioning the award of the federal highway funds on the state’s’ adoption of a uniform minimum drinking age.

What was the rationale for the justices opinions on the South Dakota v Dole?

In a 7-to-2 decision, the Court held that Congress, acting indirectly to encourage uniformity in states’ drinking ages, was within constitutional bounds. The Court found that the legislation was in pursuit of “the general welfare,” and that the means chosen to do so were reasonable.

What were the central issues in South Dakota v Dole?

Congress required states to set the minimum drinking age at 21, or lose 10% of federal funding for their highways. South Dakota brought a constitutional challenge to the Act against Secretary of Transportation Elizabeth Dole. Lewis Franklin Powell, Jr.

How did South Dakota v Dole affect federalism?

In South Dakota v. Dole (1987), the Supreme Court upheld a federal law denying 5% of federal highway funds to states that refused to enact a law raising their drinking age to 21 (a measure the federal government claimed was related to promoting highway safety).

What is the significance of South Dakota v Dole?

Dole, 483 U.S. 203 (1987), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court considered the limitations that the Constitution places on the authority of the United States Congress when Congress uses its authority to influence the individual states in areas of authority normally reserved to the states.

What were the central issues in South Dakota v Dole quizlet?

What was the central issue in South Dakota v. Dole? the national government’s authority to penalize states that did not adopt a legal drinking age of at least 21 AND the national government’s authority to provide transportation grants with specific conditions.

What does the Constitution say about government spending?

C1. 2 Spending Power. Article I, Section 8, Clause 1: The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States; . . …

How did Gibbons vs Ogden impact federalism?

The Gibbons v. Ogden decision served to vastly expand the power of Congress and the federal government. Now, Congress could regulate any commercial activity which moved between two states. This meant that the vast majority of business could become regulated by the United States.

What were the central issues in South Dakota v Dole choose every correct answer?

Which of the following is typically pointed out as a disadvantage of the U.S. federal system today multiple choice question?

Which of the following is typically pointed out as a disadvantage of the US federal system today? It creates inequalities in services and policies.

What does the Constitution say about general Welfare?

Article I, Section 8, Clause 1: The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States; . . . See W.

Who is responsible for general Welfare?

Congress
Congress is charged by the Constitution with providing for the general welfare of the country’s citizens. Historically, this has meant improving transportation, promoting agriculture and industry, protecting health and the environment, and seeking ways to solve social and economic problems.